Description

This blog is a science research blog which is working on a theory known as MULTIVERSE. For information please go through the posts

Navbar

Drop Down MenusCSS Drop Down MenuPure CSS Dropdown Menu

Tuesday, 29 March 2016

Beyond Euclidean Geometry

Euclidean Geometry ruled mathematics for 2 millennia. Even today a beginner in mathematics would believe that Euclidean geometry is perfect and it is impossible to prove it wrong. Why is it so? The answer is Euclidean Geometry is based on our common sense and our day-to-day experiences. However modern physics and mathematics is beyond common sense.

What does our common sense say?  Famous philosopher Aristotle in his book On heaven wrote “The line has magnitude in one way, the plane in two ways, and the solid in three ways, and beyond these there is no other magnitude because the three are all.” Further astronomer Ptolmey came up with proof for this. His proof was simple: there can be only three lines mutually perpendicular to each other.

Bernhard Riemann, a student of the famous mathematician Gauss, came up with an alternative to Euclidean Geometry. He proposed Hyperspace. Before understanding hyperspace let us imagine a race of two-dimensional creature living on a sheet of paper. Their day-to-day experience will make them conclude that they live in a two dimensional world and as they don’t experience anything three dimensional, mathematicians in this flat world would conclude that only 2 dimensions exists and more than two dimensions is nonsense.

simple.wikipedia.org


Riemann imagined the same world of flatlanders but on a crumpled sheet of paper. What would these flatlanders feel now? Riemann concluded that flatlanders would still find their world flat as they themselves are crumpled. However when they try to walk in this crumpled world they would experience unseen mysterious force acting on them making them move right and left like a drunkard. However we know that this force experienced by the flatlanders is nothing but effect of the uneven terrain in which they live.
He then applied the same to our world. He predicted force to be a result of unevenness of the terrain of the three dimensional world we live in viewed from forth spatial dimension.

abyss.uoregon.edu
Another thing proposed by Euclid is that sum of all the angles of a triangle is always 180o. Riemann realized that this holds only in a flat surface. He realized that a surface can have positive curvature (like outer surface of a sphere) or negative curvature (a saddle) as well. Euclidean geometry didn’t hold in such surfaces.

Table 1
Type of plane Parallel Lines Sum of angles triangle
Flat Plane Never meets is exactly 180o
Positively Curved Plane Never meets is greater than 180o
Negatively Curved Plane Always meet is less than 180o

Riemann’s main aim was to mathematically explain how crumpled the sheet is. He was successful in this by the introduction of set of number defining how crumpled the space is at a given point. Let us take the example of four dimensional space. Riemann realized that to define a point at a point he needs 10 numerical values. This was represented in a 4x4 board as follow (note that g­12=g21 and so on. Therefore six values are redundant)

Table 2
g11 g21 g31 g41
g12 g22 g32 g42
g13 g23 g33 g43
g14 g24 g34 g44
These sets of numbers are called metric tensor. It is used to get all mathematical information needed to describe how curved or crumpled a point in N-dimensions.

A tesseract (4D of a cube) undergoing double rotation in 4D space.

Saturday, 12 March 2016

What is "Time"?

            In the modern globalized world every person keeps thinking about time. Time is very important for all of us now. A famous saying in English "time and tide waits for no one" proves its importance. So is it for physics lovers. Time is a very interesting concept in physics and is also a very beautiful concept. Let’s start with the simplest thing about time, its unit.

s71.photobucket.com
            SI unit of time is second. What is one second? One second can be defined as the time taken by light to cover 299,792,458 meters. As speed of light is 299,792,458 m/s, the time taken to cover that distance will be obviously, 1 second. Will one second be same for everyone? A common person will say yes, one second is one second for all how can it vary from person to person. If you think the same way sadly it’s wrong. Time varies with your velocity. As you approach the speed of light, you will feel the time to have slowed down. Why?

            Before understanding it let us understand few other concepts.
  • 1.     Speed of light in a vacuum is same for all (3 x 10^8 m/s), irrespective of the velocity the observer is travelling. In the sense if a person is travelling at velocity of let’s say 1.5 x 10^8 m/s (for example), he would still measure the speed of light to be 3 x 10^8 m/s and a person at rest will measure the velocity of light to be 3 x 10^8 m/s.
  • 2.     Law of physics remains the same in all inertial frame of reference.
  • 3.     Speed of light is a cosmic speed limit; it is not possible to go faster than speed of light.
          
           Now let us look at a situation from two different frames of reference. Let’s say a person is travelling at velocity of 1.5 x 10^8 m/s, with a photon clock. In a photon clock a ray of light keeps getting reflected perpendicular between to reflecting surfaces, let's say mirrors. 


            Case (i)
            Let's say that the person who is travelling sees the clock. He will find the clock to be stationary and the ray of light will be getting reflected perpendicular to the mirrors, as per him.
            Case (ii)
            Now let's say another person is standing and watches this person with the photon clock moving. How will he see the ray of light in the clock? Is the clock stationary as per him? The answer is no. The clock is moving therefore by the time the ray reaches from one mirror the other mirror would have moved so the diagram will be like this:


            It is obvious that the distance covered by ray in Case (ii) is greater than that it Case (i). We know that distance covered is directly proportional to time taken. Therefore the observer without the clock will feel that the moving person is aging slowly. This phenomena is called time dilation. This phenomena is negligible at small scale however the when the velocity is huge this phenomenon is observed clearly. This gave rise to an interesting paradox called twin paradox.

            Therefore we can say that one second is not the same for all. So our speed makes a huge difference at large scale. What are the other affects it has? We will discuss about it later.